Big Life Foundation
Facebook icon twitter square red 64x Instagram Vimeo  DONATE

181008 ivory jeremygoss

Big Life’s intelligence work continues to pay off, as just last week, we supported yet another ivory bust in Kenya.

One of our informers caught wind of a potential ivory sale and pretended to be a buyer in order to set up a deal. When the ivory and the suspects were all in one place, Kenya Wildlife Service officers made the arrest, removing 21 kg of illegal ivory from the black market.

Ironically, on that very same day, the Standing Committee (SC) to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) shocked the world by exempting Kenya and Tanzania (along with a handful of other countries) from the National Ivory Action Plan (NIAP) process—a process designed to strengthen controls over and help combat the illegal trade in ivory.

Applauded for “substantially achieving” their NIAPs and for “further measures taken to address illegal trade in ivory,” it was agreed that Kenya and Tanzania—both Category A Parties, meaning they are the “most affected by the illegal trade in ivory”—may now exit the reporting process altogether.

While both Kenya and Tanzania have made measurable progress, it is a stretch for CITES to suggest that they have “achieved their NIAPs.”

It is well known that Kenya, particularly Mombasa, remains a key exit point for illegal ivory that is headed to Asia. And although Kenya (whose elephant population is now relatively stable and increasing in some areas) set a commendable example to the world by burning its ivory stockpile in 2016, Tanzania (whose elephant population has suffered one of the most dramatic declines of any African range state) continues to sit on over 100 tons of ivory. Of this, no large-scale seizure has undergone any form of CITES-required DNA analysis in the last eight years.

Both countries do, of course, have long histories of corruption, although efforts are being made to address this. But the result has been weakened enforcement, insufficient conviction rates, lenient sentencing, and irregular reporting to CITES. All of which leaves us scratching our heads and wondering: What is CITES thinking??

Given the amount of illegal ivory that Big Life continues to confiscate moving through our area of operation—over a ton last year, and rapidly closing in on the same this year—we find it extremely alarming that CITES has made this decision, with very little reasonable justification, when there is clearly much more work to be done.

In the face of this setback, Big Life remains more committed than ever to our intelligence operations and to ending the trafficking of illegal ivory.

We thank you, as always, for your support, which makes our work possible.         

 

Share This
 
80% to 100% of Proceeds go to Big Life
160213 1 1 Ranger of the Month January 2016
February 13, 2016

RANGER OF THE MONTH: JANUARY 2016

It’s hard to think straight when you’ve got a lion on your roof, but a warrior’s spear had already glanced off the car and Seiko had to act fast. He put his foot down and the little Suzuki 4x4 went crashing through the… Read More
150519 1 1 Ranger of the Month April 2015 Moloimet Legos
May 19, 2015

BIG LIFE RANGER OF THE MONTH, APRIL 2015: MOLOIMET LEGOS

It was early morning. The young men moved swiftly through the bush. The tracks were fresh and the warriors moved fast, excitement building as they anticipated the combat ahead. By mid afternoon, the warriors found their… Read More
141206 1 1 Ranger of the Month November 2014 Senior Sergeant Lekina Olempumpu
December 06, 2014

BIG LIFE RANGER OF THE MONTH, NOVEMBER 2014: SENIOR SERGEANT LEKINA OLEMPUMPU

Anti-poaching rangers are strong, courageous individuals. They spend whole days patrolling the bush, tracking poachers, and keeping the peace between wildlife and humans. It takes an even stronger character to lead… Read More
141002 1 1 Ranger of the Month August Dickson Ntawuasa
October 02, 2014

BIG LIFE RANGER OF THE MONTH, AUGUST: DICKSON NTAWUASA

A rhino named Dickson, who would have thought? Certainly not the man himself when he stepped in his new position as a ranger 22 years ago.There were only ten rangers back then, a motley crew starting off in a role never… Read More